Skip to main content

The Rally to Restore Sanity, and Congressional elections

The image is one taken from the Marvel/Disney Mashups series and is available here. I thought it appropriate to what is being billed as the coming Republican win in the American congressional elections.

America being the sort of republic it is, it has often been difficult for entertainers to avoid being dragged into politics. Properly speaking, politics is the business of everyone in America, after all. Charlie Chaplin was an enemy of the FBI without knowing it, Bob Hope rallied troops in the Vietnam war, P.T.Barnum became a state representative in Connecticut, and Mort Sahl campaigned for what he believed to be necessary disclosure in the first Kennedy assassination. Barnum, as ever, is interesting on the point; he sought election after bankruptcy, humiliation, and lawsuits, presumably on the basis that things couldn't really get much worse so he might as well give it a go.

So the waters in which Steven Colbert and Jon Stewart are now sailing are not, really, virgin territory. You don't have to be staring at the correxit foam on the waters of the gulf to know that currents change, though. The spirit of vicious dispute and rancour which the media must now feed on to make money, and which various interests depend upon, is as bad as at any time in the nineteenth-century republic. I read what Stewart said about a country that could go to the moon, heal itself, and get to work on time with the beginnings of a lump in my throat, but he and his colleagues will now face a fairly systemic assault.

Stewart has already proved adept at taking down media loudmouths like Jim Cramer. Colbert's performance before George Bush at the WHCA dinner a few years ago was one of the all-time demonstrations of cojones. But, well...the interests and attitudes unleashed by recession, the cusp of decline, and the daily grind of debt, inequality, and cultural narcissism have poisoned America and some of that is heading comedy central's way.

Stewart and Colbert are plenty tough, however, and anyway, many in the beltway elites currently disguised as pitchfork-wielding peasants on Fox will have discounted their effect, so keen are they to anticipate a 'Mondale wave' like in 1982. I have to say, I am having a little trouble seeing it, and remain to be convinced.

What seems to be going to happen is that most Democrats are going to get a well-deserved kicking for being a shower in the legislature during a horrible economic time.

Because that simple fact does not play into dramatised and political agendas, the result will have to be spun into some sort of Aaron Sorkin style referendum on Barack Obama's centrist presidency. That in turn will waste time that the United States does not have, and unless someone seizes the initiative, and does something to concentrate minds, Rome's fiddles will drown out the sound of the burning.

On a more prosaic political note, the rally may comfort liberals, but it should also provide people with time to reflect on an important point. Jimmy Carter was derailed by a Democrat Congress in 1977-8 and fatally wounded by a Democrat challenger in 1980; Bill Clinton was almost destroyed by congressional Democratic failures in 1994; and things started to come apart for Lyndon Johnson in 1966, when a Democrat congress was dismissed following a year of spending and reforming without explaining, after the great civil rights achievement. That Nancy Pelosi has spent a part of the past couple of years attempting to shut down her nominal deputy, Steny Hoyer, rather than attempting to squeeze a few more districts into the Democrat column, speaks volumes about the sort of leader that party throws up in parliamentary assemblies.

Then again, other things got done, and maybe he deserved it. Congress is a complicated and devious sort of a place, and its values seep into both parties intimately, but the Democrats more because they are so much more of a 'court' than a 'country' party, except in their imaginations. I remember wading through the antebellum records of the house on a research trip to Washington years ago, and finding multiple references to 'overindulgence in fruit' that kept Senators and Congressmen from voting. It wasn't that the food was particularly bitter or poisonous, though it may have been in a town that is, for all intents and purposes, still a sort of swamp. The phrase was just an ordinary, standard lie. Petroleum Naseby and Plunkitt of Tammany Hall would have understood immediately. Those lies are in the air over there. Even monks use euphemisms in DC, in my experience.

The congressional Democratic party, out of which Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton emerged last year, is an albatross for Democratic presidents when in power, and, historically, is terribly bad at connecting with the electorate and the media. Losing it, especially if the loss is accompanied by narrowly holding on in one or two unexpected places (for the narrative), may not do Obama 2012 too much harm at all. Something else will have to, from the right's point of view. That's why I expect some republican-funded anti-Obama effort to push for a 2012 Democrat nomination fight to get going next Thursday. Daft liberals who'd be up for it abound. Sometimes, I think the Democrats should just let Joan Walsh go around punching faces and stabbing kidneys until people are quiet.

My other reflection is that this latest series of congressional elections are the first, post Citizens United. That case allowed semi-anonymous rich people and corporations to attempt to buy elections, and to provide cover for their chosen candidates, as well as allowing unions and liberal groups to do the same. This has been going on for a while--the names Scaife, Bloomberg and Soros spring to mind, but it seems to have somehow been validated as a thing that can show its face in the light of day. Rich people are attempting to buy the republic on their own terms.

If very wealthy candidates are rejected in California, if Crist plus Meeks make a majority in Florida, and if Democrats win in a few districts in places like New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, West Virginia or Kentucky, despite the onslaught, then issues and voter perceptions, and delivery of promises will have mattered more than ads and cash. That's how it ought to be, and a hopeful sign for the future.

It's enough to raise a laugh or two all the way down the National Mall....

UPDATE: Martin in the Margins has his own ideas about all of this on his own site, and is far less happy with the rally, probably because he is a liberal person.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...