DSK: Scurrilous, ill advised or thought provoking? I noticed, around the 3-5 of June, that the following comments were appearing on various websites. At the time, I thought, as I still think, that no one can understand what goes on in a trial without the benefit of reading a very thorough report or being there--and even then, having sat in on several dozen trials, the instincts and conclusions of juries are often very difficult to fathom. Anyone holding forth as an authority on any case is immediately suspect; I have about thirty thousand JFK assassination documents on cd, or on my shelves (including a copy of the Warren Commission report, for instance, which I have read). I've accumulated them over twenty years. You know what? I haven't a clue what happened on 22 November 1963, beyond four people being shot and the Beatles releasing an album. People read the wrong focus into things often; silly little crimes become great affairs of state, and great conspiracies become one-off ...