Skip to main content

Does Anyone Remember the Rowan Williams Controversy?

Oh, you were no-one in 2008 if you didn't remember the bombastic misinterpretation of the Anglican ecclesial leader's Middle Temple lecture on Islam.... but whilst all this has died down, an interesting story has appeared. It was tucked up in page three of the Financial Times and illustrates how money has a way of saying things in more complicated ways than Bishops.

The Chelsea Barracks is to be turned into luxury flats and health spas with Islamic finance vehicles. This ends 145 years of military presence between Sloane Square and the Thames.

'Shariah Finance Watch', who are some sort of minute men are not happy, but the Guardian is quite happy.

How much of a reward is this to Qatar for contributing to the European Airbus parent EADS, and how much is it a consolation prize for losing out on the purchase of Thames Water?

There is no need for everything, or indeed anything to be linked of course. It's a teenage fetish to think that nothing happens coincidentally. I am curious at how Airbus in particular, however, keeps cropping up in the expansion of European 'soft power', and how many people the EU is enmeshing in contracts with it. The Americans have noticed too.

I have put a much happier picture of a modern airship at the top of this blog, for no good reason whatsoever except that, as you know my lonely midnight reader, I love them. This time, it is of the Aeros. It is my favourite modern, in-production ship, but you may enjoy the childrens-book feel of the very real skykitten below as well, and of the SA-60 diesel-electric hybrid which has already broken records.




Comments

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Martin Meenagh said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Martin Meenagh said…
To the blogger at Shariahfinancewatch--I am happy to keep in touch, and good luck to you. Let me know if you want me to publish your name, which shows up with your blog. Other readers, go have a look.

Shalom back at you!

Popular posts from this blog

What really happened to JFK and America in Dallas?

 I realised some time ago that my students do not understand references to the events of November 1963 in Dallas anymore. So I have been using a break to compile a briefing book on the events, the use of commissions and enquiries to pursue particular narratives, and the embedding of the JFK assassination in American culture. This is the first chapter. It is a very long read. All mistakes are my own.  Before the Assassination Lee Harvey Oswald was a US Marine and radar operator at the Atsugi naval base, carrying an elevated clearance. He was also learning Russian and loudly proclaiming his Marxist-Leninist sympathies. These were not investigated or treated as a security risk. [1] Whilst at Atsugi, Oswald probably became one of a number of American marines in a programme to identify moles within the security establishment. This required him to cut his Marine service short by suggesting that he had to look after a sick mother, and also that he wished to seek higher education ...
I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...

AI and I write about Boolean Logic and conspiracies

 AI and I have been trying to make sense of what I think about the emerging political and legal landscape online. I'd thought of this as a lecture series building on somewhat vague ideas I had about what AI is, where it comes from, and how to use it for the purposes of merging Catholic thought with Georgism to escape liberalism. All quite soupy stuff. Here is one of our efforts. The Devil’s Boolean: How Modernity Turned Us Into Conspiracy Machines Modern democracies rest on a paradox. They promise freedom, rational control, and technological progress—yet deliver burnout, conspiracy, and deepening distrust. Tools meant to liberate us—social media, artificial intelligence, the market—now trap us in a relentless binary logic: success or failure, visibility or obscurity, control or collapse. That binary—what might be called a Boolean logic of the self —runs deeper than technology. It comes out of a Protestant-inflected culture that prizes achievement as a moral duty. As philosopher...