Skip to main content


The Southall Black Sisters


In keeping with the somewhat crazy and damascene nature of the blog this Palm Sunday, I would like to reveal another somewhat difficult thing. Yasmin Alibhai Brown is right about something.

This sticks in my craw. 'Yazza', or the 'Yazzmonster' as her critics refer to her (who have also, in a minor way, insulted me because of my friends) has this week run a piece on the Southall Black Sisters. Alibhai-Brown is usually wrong, as a rule. On this issue, she is absolutely right.

Southall Black Sisters are an organisation that supports black and asian women, and indeed women of all colours, who happen to be poor, or suffering violence, or isolated. They were deeply involved in the landmark Karanjit Ahluwalia case for instance. Mrs Ahluwalia was regularly beaten senseless by her husband, who returned home one night and decided to threaten her with a hot iron, demand £200, and announce that he would beat her near death in the morning. Then he went to sleep. So she, deranged with fear and determined to free herself after what she viewed as provocation, acted first.

Provocation is one of the defences built into the 1957 Homicide Act. England had no written statute concerning murder before that date; instead, case law, with all its complications, defined the crime. The Act gave a written definition (drawn from the cases) but also built in two major defences; provocation and diminished responsibility.

Provocation meant that an individual of the same age and sex as the defendant would have been provoked as the defendant was, and would have lost their self control and acted in the same way. It was often invoked by men, but the loss had to be immediate and any gap between the provocation and the loss of control--even going into another room or waiting--did away with the defence.

Diminished responsibility was the 'crazy woman' or 'alcoholic' defence; a disease of the mind acted upon by the external cause that caused temporary insanity. Many women neither wanted to rely upon it nor could they, when battered woman syndrome was not recognised.

Mrs Ahluwalia poured two pints of petrol over her worthless husband and set it alight after a decade of violence. He died. She was tried for murder, and was supported by the Southall Black Sisters in her well documented defence of provocation because of all the ten years' worth of multiple beatings and threats. She was convicted and won her appeal.

She was the first victim of such experiences to have the idea of cumulative provocation recognised by the court of appeal, though the situation has been changed a little by the cases flowing from the recent Holley decision in Jersey.

I have to say I have a great deal of pity for her, and I know that no one else other than the SBS would have helped her. Now, Ealing Council is threatening to close down the Southall Black Sisters because they do not meet the 'inclusion agenda' of the Labour government nor the priorities of Ealing's Tory council.

Southall Black Sisters are inevitably left wing and believe that women pay for the resurgence of religion. I disagree with them on that. But they do a lot of good. They are there for women who are treated shockingly. I opposed the authorities closing Catholic schools and orphanages because of their monolithic approach to 'values' ; I oppose Ealing's withdrawal of the Southall Funds.

I hope, if the Sisters do lose public money, that they may be able to raise money from friends and supporters privately. Perhaps Harriet Harman, who loudly trumpets her feminism by blaming men for everything, could hold a fundraising dinner. She did that sort of thing, after all, when she needed votes and money for her own election as Deputy Labour Leader.

Do you seriously think that the likes of Harman and Margaret Hodge will do so? I think that they will run a mile. But I stand ready to be proved wrong, if anyone even notices. The important thing is that the Sisters be saved! In those circumstances, I find myself, bizarrely, having to salute Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.

I'm off to the gym to punish myself on a treadmill. The picture at the side of this post comes from the Southall Black Sisters Website and is associated with their campaign slogan 'struggle not submission'.

Comments

bob said…
Having encountered the Southall Black Sisters a number of times over the years, they stand out as an exemplary organisation, rare in their level of integrity. You are absolutely right in what you say about them Martin.
Martin Meenagh said…
Thanks Bob. People should sign up to the 'Save the Southall Black Sisters' site on facebook, sign the petition at 10 Downing Street's website, and go to the Sisters' website to see how they can further support them.
J.D. Thrasher said…
Wow. That story made me think deeply. A person being victimized to the point where they act out...

Either way, interesting blog prof. see you in class Monday!

Popular posts from this blog

What really happened to JFK and America in Dallas?

 I realised some time ago that my students do not understand references to the events of November 1963 in Dallas anymore. So I have been using a break to compile a briefing book on the events, the use of commissions and enquiries to pursue particular narratives, and the embedding of the JFK assassination in American culture. This is the first chapter. It is a very long read. All mistakes are my own.  Before the Assassination Lee Harvey Oswald was a US Marine and radar operator at the Atsugi naval base, carrying an elevated clearance. He was also learning Russian and loudly proclaiming his Marxist-Leninist sympathies. These were not investigated or treated as a security risk. [1] Whilst at Atsugi, Oswald probably became one of a number of American marines in a programme to identify moles within the security establishment. This required him to cut his Marine service short by suggesting that he had to look after a sick mother, and also that he wished to seek higher education ...
I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...

AI and I write about Boolean Logic and conspiracies

 AI and I have been trying to make sense of what I think about the emerging political and legal landscape online. I'd thought of this as a lecture series building on somewhat vague ideas I had about what AI is, where it comes from, and how to use it for the purposes of merging Catholic thought with Georgism to escape liberalism. All quite soupy stuff. Here is one of our efforts. The Devil’s Boolean: How Modernity Turned Us Into Conspiracy Machines Modern democracies rest on a paradox. They promise freedom, rational control, and technological progress—yet deliver burnout, conspiracy, and deepening distrust. Tools meant to liberate us—social media, artificial intelligence, the market—now trap us in a relentless binary logic: success or failure, visibility or obscurity, control or collapse. That binary—what might be called a Boolean logic of the self —runs deeper than technology. It comes out of a Protestant-inflected culture that prizes achievement as a moral duty. As philosopher...