Skip to main content


Barack Obama's Pastor

The recent silly media dispute in America about Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama's pastor, has been the occasion for three refreshing developments. One is Obama's great speech on race, which I think was an address comparable to Lincoln's Cooper Union Address and well worth the time that I spent listening to it. Another was the confirmation, if I needed it, of the determination of the media to ignore John McCain's official preacher de choix, Jim Hagee, and his anticatholic tirades and fifth monarchist, near-anabaptist extremism.

A third thing that I thought that I could point out, however, is how much Wright's freewheeling sermons revealed the memory of history that many Africa Americans have but which the vast majority of American society is ignorant about.

Let's take the allegation that most people thought was the 'most outrageous' in Wright's sermon, drawn in passion from the depth of his mind; that officials in the American government had manufactured AIDS in some fashion and set it against black people. It might seem of a piece with the views of Thabo Mbeki, that AIDS is a disease of poverty that may have multiple sources which has been much more destructive and much less noted in the American media.

Really though, how many people remember that for nearly half a century after 1932, black men were studied in the throes of late-stage syphilis and given placebo treatments in the USA as part of a study of the effects on human beings? They were lied to and racked in pain and President Clinton eventually had to apologise for it. What would suffering a crime as a group like that do to an identity?

Or again, how many people studied the reaction of the African American community to substantiated allegations that crack cocaine emerged from Ronald Reagan's contra wars and was allowed into the black districts of American cities by the Central Intelligence Agency?

Though stories of American use of biological weapons in Korea in the fifties have been debunked, even the journal of the American Medical Association has noted serious allegations which, for many of those who have read of the attempted use of infected blankets or the shooting of dead animals in drinking water during the nineteenth century, raise all sorts of paranoia.

It's also the case that the post-September 11 worries about anthrax, which were many and apparently serious, mostly track back to varieties of the biological agent manufactured in the USA. It is also true though that a natural origin for the material was possible

In the face of all this--not to mention nearly 5000 deaths from lynchings and millions upon millions of deaths in slavery, why shouldn't a black church that seeks empowerment seek to contextualise and rationalise anger? Surely, Wright's mistake was to allow it expression without attempting to move on from it.

Except he did. It's simply that no one is listening. Wright's former church in Chicago has been noted as central to efforts to deal with poverty, AIDS, and violence in America. He also said a few silly things about Palestinians about which I do not approve, and some that called for Israeli-Palestinian dialogue (admittedly in what seemed a spirit of ignorance) of which I do approve.

Contrast all this with Jim Hagee, and the rest of the Republican evangelical crowd. Here's a video of Pat Robertson inciting murder, of which he ought to be ashamed frankly. There is a case for a prosecution for incitement to politically motivated murder under the UK terrorism acts, I would have thought, though I feel somewhat hyperbolic in saying it and Mr Robertson has since denied what he is saying below is what he was saying. If you get my drift. Apparently Hugo Chavez, a bog-standard South American populist dictator, is spreading communism and islam and other such things in oil drums.



John McCain has accepted the endorsement of Jim Hagee and praised Pat Robertson. He has also appeared at Bob Jones University, which as far as I can see maintained bans on interracial dating into the 21st century. One of its professors used one of McCain's adopted children--who was from Bangladesh--against him in a racist smear campaign in 2000. Still, you can't blame McCain. Here's a picture of the gipper with Bob Jones himself.



Really, when all this is considered, put what Obama has done into context. Then you won't be surprised that he has gone up in the polls, and Clinton down, after the collective heads of the United States Press Corps exploded a couple of weeks ago and she started banging on about it.

There is one rather jarring note to all of this. John McCain has, when he hasn't been quiet, actually defended freedom of speech on this one. That means he is either a decent Republican or an intelligent one. I have known a few of those, and frankly, they are a very tough opponent to beat if you are of a moderate inclination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What really happened to JFK and America in Dallas?

 I realised some time ago that my students do not understand references to the events of November 1963 in Dallas anymore. So I have been using a break to compile a briefing book on the events, the use of commissions and enquiries to pursue particular narratives, and the embedding of the JFK assassination in American culture. This is the first chapter. It is a very long read. All mistakes are my own.  Before the Assassination Lee Harvey Oswald was a US Marine and radar operator at the Atsugi naval base, carrying an elevated clearance. He was also learning Russian and loudly proclaiming his Marxist-Leninist sympathies. These were not investigated or treated as a security risk. [1] Whilst at Atsugi, Oswald probably became one of a number of American marines in a programme to identify moles within the security establishment. This required him to cut his Marine service short by suggesting that he had to look after a sick mother, and also that he wished to seek higher education ...
I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...

AI and I write about Boolean Logic and conspiracies

 AI and I have been trying to make sense of what I think about the emerging political and legal landscape online. I'd thought of this as a lecture series building on somewhat vague ideas I had about what AI is, where it comes from, and how to use it for the purposes of merging Catholic thought with Georgism to escape liberalism. All quite soupy stuff. Here is one of our efforts. The Devil’s Boolean: How Modernity Turned Us Into Conspiracy Machines Modern democracies rest on a paradox. They promise freedom, rational control, and technological progress—yet deliver burnout, conspiracy, and deepening distrust. Tools meant to liberate us—social media, artificial intelligence, the market—now trap us in a relentless binary logic: success or failure, visibility or obscurity, control or collapse. That binary—what might be called a Boolean logic of the self —runs deeper than technology. It comes out of a Protestant-inflected culture that prizes achievement as a moral duty. As philosopher...