Skip to main content
Camille Paglia, again

I'm a big fan of Camille Paglia. I think that she has a very clear, and rich, mind, that she seems a woman who feels comfortable with ordinary folk, and has a passion for culture and plain-speaking. Her columns at salon.com, detailing her distaste for the left as much as her revelling in the shock value of Rush Limbaugh, are very great fun, which is high praise. I imagine that she has very little obviously in common with me, but what would life be if we were all the same?

So I was interested to see in Dr Paglia's latest columns something that I have been picking up on too. For some on the American right, and I don't mean all republicans here, paranoia, militancy, and an increasing wish to just walk away from normal debate are congealing into something else. All one needs is to totally deligitimise government and to cast centrists as liberal enemies of the country and of all decency, and something will give; these people are heavily, and righteously,--and, before you say it, rightfully-- armed.

Over the course of the past few years on this blog, I have clearly been following a much more alienated and conservative path than I started out with. One of my first ever blogs was about how, with a re-election figure amounting to just under 22% of the electorate, things would go wrong for the British government very badly when things went wrong globally; I have also noted how this was a kind of rough justice for such a debased state.

I think that polarisation for forty years has shredded the anyhow tenuous civic peace of the American republic in a similar way. When things start going wrong in the United States of America, however, they won't be as nasty or bilious as politics is getting here; they will be infinitely worse. So, to see Dr Paglia picking up on this has really made me think, and I would urge you to go and have a read of her lines too.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Why don't you stop your friend Neil Clark from humiliating himself like this?
http://timesonline.typepad.com/oliver_kamm/2009/05/spuriosity-shop-chapter-94.html
Martin Meenagh said…
Hi Anonymous. Look, Free men can have whatever opinions they want, and we're not each other's keepers, any of us. We can disagree. What I think is important that you do so without having personal goes at people and without investing debates with all this sort of thing.

It's what I keep going on about--courtesy. Martin Kelly, whom I would direct you to, has a typically decent response to this too.

This is the reason, most of all, I think, why I'm not really part of the self-defined 'left', though I was a Labour member I guess culturally. People get so angry and heavy so quickly, and they hit on the chinks and inconsistencies in life rather than approaching people as friends until they behave otherwise.

Neil has always been kind and courteous to me, and for a while a few years ago we were colleagues--I enjoy achat with him from time to time, and I guess we disagree on a good few things, but I can't change anything so what does it matter? We have another Judge, ultimately.

Opinions can differ, and on things I don't know about, like all the stuff flying around blogland, I won't have a go at people, including you.
Martin Meenagh said…
Sorry, am tired. I meant 'keeper' in the zoo sense, not the Cain one. Perhaps I need feeding....

Popular posts from this blog

The Congressional Healthcare Bill in America I spent a good deal of this morning and yesterday reading over the proposed American healthcare bill (or at least, a compound version; there appear to be five doing the rounds). I don't want to blog on the details of it immediately. It's also a bill, which may well stall in the Senate or be overtaken by events, and which could yet be critically amended. It is the product of Congress, not the administration per se, and the lawyers have not yet got at it. I had some instant worries about it though. In no particular order, I'll list them; Firstly, it can't allow individuals to choose their doctor and treatment in the long run; instead, it will practically formalise the role of doctors as salaried employees of large medical groups. Sarah Palin is onto something with the idea that this will then allow essentially ideological or non-medical outlooks on, say, euthanasia, abortion, transgender issues, or non-emergency treatments of c...
William Orpen There are four major Christian traditions, which are of course Catholic, Orthodox, Armenian and Coptic. Some sects and cults also exist, like the Moonies or Anglicanism. Yet in some bizarre way this weekend, protestant contributions to something other than the seizure of churches have been making their way into my consciousness. I suppose that the first indication of this trend was a reflection in an old copy of Gibbon that he actually became cultured because of Calvinism. Packed off to Switzerland because he went Catholic at an otherwise boring Oxford, Gibbon fell in love with Suzanne Cuchod, and with Greek because of instruction from a Calvinist mentor. It's an odd thing--I keep coming across indications of Calvinists who could have fun, though they doubtless thought that they would pay for it later, and whose political intelligence was second to none. Althusius springs to mind, for instance. But then what am I thinking, I thought to myself? I've sat on balconi...
Damon Buffini I'm not quite sure what to make of this story. Damon Buffini, a multi-millionaire in the City, and a very accomplished man, seems to have heard staff he regarded as lazy and ungrateful at the upper levels of management complaining about restaurants. He subsequently forced them all to eat two-day old Big Macs whilst reminding them of how lucky they are. It's nice to know that Saturn--in the form of a sort of globalisation guevara--could force his children to eat rather than devouring them, as in Goya's painting. How broken do people have to be not to walk out, though? I guess from his point of view, if they had any spine they'd be in business on their own. The whole thing is horribly fascinating.