Skip to main content
The Next Wave

There are a lot of fairly silly pieces doing the rounds at the moment about how the US and Uk may have 'turned the corner' on the financial collapse. This seems to be based on an optimistic reading of US and USA growth over the past few decades, plus a narrow focus on debt as a percentage of GDP. The argument, which on its own terms has some merit, that the US should never be anything like the major euro-zone economies is being made on sundry blogs. The you-tube piece below is a fairly good example of the sort of thing being said defensively.

I note from various publicly published sources that national debt as a percentage of GDP was still far lower in the US last year than in France or Germany. But how much water does one need over one's head before you realise you are not a fish?

Surprisingly, figures for consumer debt per inhabitant also seem to suggest that the US household is less burdened than the European. I find this hard to believe, but perhaps the average European just doesn't realise it. It should be recalled that Europeans are used to longer debts, less aggressive debt collection, and oligopolistic banks, and that patterns of debt vary widely across the euro-zone.

Nevertheless, I think that there is something in the idea that US policy makers may have convinced themselves that they are dodging the bullets with their names on them. I think, however, that after an era of globalisation, we are facing a long global crisis and that the past few months have only been the beginning.

Here is what I would like people to think about. The Eurozone banks are incredibly leveraged, particularly in Germany. The eurozone governments are very strained; if they were at or near surplus with low debt, they have been effectively forced into lending it to debtors on cheap terms in countries largely to the South of Europe. Their social systems depend upon a relatively high level of taxation, and their economies depended upon exports.

Though they did not face the vertiginous plunge that Britain and America faced, they are in remorseless decline themselves. Their unemployment is rising, and people are taking to the streets. Many governments in Central and Eastern Europe are effectively bankrupt.

So what is a UK/US 'recovery' worth, even if it happens?

These governments previously sold the United States goods and lent it money. They are focussed at the minute on a paradigm in which the US must be propped up, and the euro allowed temporarily as they see it to take up slack as a reserve currency, and in which they must simply hold on until the US recovers.

I think that the Chinese have a different idea. They have worked out that the US will be in the doldrums when Europe can't pay for it or earn from it and think that the US will be turning up asking them for more money. In the alternative, they can see that the US will seek, if it does manage to recover without the Europeans, to compete with China for dwindling global resources.

Therefore, they have been buying up commodities and oil assets, and recycling dollars and euros whilst doing so, at some pace. I might just point out that they have also oriented themselves inevitably to the Indian Ocean and are building a huge navy. When will the point come when commodities are only priced in dollars, as they now almost universally are, just to recycle old and diminishing Chinese stocks of that currency before they start paying in SDRs or renmimbi? How will the US react to that? How can the euro be anything other than a temporarily stable intermediate stage towards it?

The Russians have also noticed something is up. Last week, they quietly annexed the remains of their captured Ossetian regions, encouraged Caucasian states to re-orient their oil and economic affiliation to them, and played a game of trading off assets in central asia against Chinese sources. They started settling matters with the Ukraine. The way Turkey moved to progress relations with Armenia also suggests to me that they are all revolving around the gravity wells of oil pipelines, and responding to an increasingly evident and pressing need for advantage in the years to come.

The clear eyed men and women in Beijing and Moscow are preparing themselves for a world in which they can step back from the dollar and the euro, and they want an IMF currency backed by their own assets and a few sovereign funds to run it as the oil runs out.

A fatal complacency could now set in, in which the US prepares for inflation as a consequence of an apparent recovery and the euro-zone ignores its systemic problems in the manner of the third republic in 1939, hoping that they will go away. Europe will then wake up as winter approaches after a euro crisis to a world in which energy is desperately important and private companies and banks are collapsing, and will be forced to play games in the caucasus, and with Turkey, Algeria and Libya for their pipelines or energy resources, but it will be too late.

They may find that their gold has rusted. Then, as I am saying to the point of cliche lately, they'll have to face what iron will do.

Soon, Americans won't be worrying about whether they should be like France. They'll be worried about what they are to do with Mexico collapsing below the Rio Grande, the US States unable to fund themselves, the Chinese calling in debts because they now don't need to recycle so much into the American economy, and the Europeans descending into panic. The whole west may now be starting to slide and it may have mistaken a breathing space for a calm. Soon, we won't be able to afford that ruinous stupid set of wars we are overtly and covertly fighting.

This crisis is ongoing and worsening. Use your mind and read between the lines of the media manipulation. We are in historic trouble and major political backlash in Europe is on the horizon. Meanwhile, Russia and China are playing their hands very well.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The front page of the Sydney Morning Herald (weekend edition)screams
'America will not protect us, says Rudd'. It seems we should be very concerned by the Chinese military build-up, to the extent that this country is to spend a fortune onincreasing it's naval and air power. Scarey.
Love Mary
Martin Meenagh said…
Hi Mary

I don't pretend to be an expert on this. Is China really, as an external power--leaving aside the way they organise things internally--a 'mad' or expansive power? What would you take into account?

One surely is that China is and always has been commodity-poor. It has funded a deficit with Asian, African, Australian and South American suppliers via a surplus with the United States and Europe. That suggests to me that they will want to create a zone of financial stability and preferential trade in the Indian Ocean, but not to deploy beyond it.

However, commodities will be, for perfectly sensible reasons, in diminishing supply in the future regardless of any western recovery. This is, to my mind, particularly because of the growth of India. Therefore, we'll see some naval competition over various islands and straits, and over energy grids, and over allies in Asia. Again, that suggests that Australia, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Indochina and New Zealand (and I was told last week that one could walk to Indonesia from Australia at the right time of the year)could emerge as balances. Breathless planning for war could derail that, but I am beginning to see the point of a 'plug and play' local neutral group that the Chinese, South Koreans, Japanese and Indians could trust. I wonder how much of the 'anti-pirate' action off of Somalia right now is a dry-run for naval coordination.

I can also see that China is a country which, though it contains different ethnic identities, values 'domestic' marriage. Yet, thanks to the one-child policy, there are tens of millions of Chinese men who will never have a Chinese wife. All those frustrated individuals, plus resource decline, may suggest trouble, but I wonder if we can't expect another future where the desire for a family leads many out of a nationalist crouch.

Who knows? Despite the evidence of this blog, I far prefer optimism to pessimism, and as my friend Martin Kelly says, there is always hope. We should approach it clear eyed, though.

Thanks for the information about the Australian papers, I'll have a look. I'm starting to really like them.

Popular posts from this blog

The Congressional Healthcare Bill in America I spent a good deal of this morning and yesterday reading over the proposed American healthcare bill (or at least, a compound version; there appear to be five doing the rounds). I don't want to blog on the details of it immediately. It's also a bill, which may well stall in the Senate or be overtaken by events, and which could yet be critically amended. It is the product of Congress, not the administration per se, and the lawyers have not yet got at it. I had some instant worries about it though. In no particular order, I'll list them; Firstly, it can't allow individuals to choose their doctor and treatment in the long run; instead, it will practically formalise the role of doctors as salaried employees of large medical groups. Sarah Palin is onto something with the idea that this will then allow essentially ideological or non-medical outlooks on, say, euthanasia, abortion, transgender issues, or non-emergency treatments of c...
William Orpen There are four major Christian traditions, which are of course Catholic, Orthodox, Armenian and Coptic. Some sects and cults also exist, like the Moonies or Anglicanism. Yet in some bizarre way this weekend, protestant contributions to something other than the seizure of churches have been making their way into my consciousness. I suppose that the first indication of this trend was a reflection in an old copy of Gibbon that he actually became cultured because of Calvinism. Packed off to Switzerland because he went Catholic at an otherwise boring Oxford, Gibbon fell in love with Suzanne Cuchod, and with Greek because of instruction from a Calvinist mentor. It's an odd thing--I keep coming across indications of Calvinists who could have fun, though they doubtless thought that they would pay for it later, and whose political intelligence was second to none. Althusius springs to mind, for instance. But then what am I thinking, I thought to myself? I've sat on balconi...
Damon Buffini I'm not quite sure what to make of this story. Damon Buffini, a multi-millionaire in the City, and a very accomplished man, seems to have heard staff he regarded as lazy and ungrateful at the upper levels of management complaining about restaurants. He subsequently forced them all to eat two-day old Big Macs whilst reminding them of how lucky they are. It's nice to know that Saturn--in the form of a sort of globalisation guevara--could force his children to eat rather than devouring them, as in Goya's painting. How broken do people have to be not to walk out, though? I guess from his point of view, if they had any spine they'd be in business on their own. The whole thing is horribly fascinating.