Skip to main content
Creationism

People are free to believe whatever they like. Any decent approach would attempt to persuade, either by example or words, but recognise that people can make up their own mind. If their faith is strong enough, then God or the universe can deal with those who don't believe, frankly.

I've just come back from mass and was, as usual, surprised to find on the web a certain amount of ignorance about faith, some of it spread by the faithful. Surely it should now be obvious, to people--after all, you've had nearly two thousand years--that the Catholic Church (tm and (c)) which I love has a passing acquaintance with the literal word of the bible (choose your version and translation), but also with the holy spirit's guidance of a church defined by a logic which depends only upon its premises. Catholics are in fact enjoined to believe so that they may understand--credo ut intelligam--set out by the pope amongst others.

It is very possible to see this as a duty to be rational and skeptical. That, presumably, is the way the catholic priest who modelled the big bang or the catholics who developed the spectrograph at the Vatican Observatory thought.

Catholics are also under a duty to love any sinners, and to separate them from any sin; and to remind themselves that they are as flawed as anyone else and that heavenly access is a kind of monopsony mediated by Petrine nepotism, not an insurance policy. So, no patronising thickies and no absolute certainties about things outside of the body of the faith.

I only say this because I've just read on the web that 'creationism' or 'intelligent design' may be taught in Catholic schools. As far as I can tell, the only way it could be would be to refute it, and in fact should be. When should anyone, especially Catholics, be afraid of the truth? We have been at our flawed human worst when we have hid in the darkness.

One fact that people should just be told and allowed to discuss; ninety nine per cent of all species that ever existed are extinct.

Predicating your faith upon a creator who either gets it right one per cent of the time, or who is some sort of universal tinkerer, or who deliberately destroys is not, so to speak, my cup of tea. I find it hard to be writing this, but according to Sarah Palin, her dad was a science teacher and that position is the one she's taken.

At the minute, the most we can say, and Palin and the Pope agree on this, is that God originated a universe somehow that invented evolution and that depends on physics. That's intelligent design for you, though its also a fantastically stupid debate which results in very little enlightenment, I would have thought.

Please think about that if you have any intention of voting for her.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Orpen There are four major Christian traditions, which are of course Catholic, Orthodox, Armenian and Coptic. Some sects and cults also exist, like the Moonies or Anglicanism. Yet in some bizarre way this weekend, protestant contributions to something other than the seizure of churches have been making their way into my consciousness. I suppose that the first indication of this trend was a reflection in an old copy of Gibbon that he actually became cultured because of Calvinism. Packed off to Switzerland because he went Catholic at an otherwise boring Oxford, Gibbon fell in love with Suzanne Cuchod, and with Greek because of instruction from a Calvinist mentor. It's an odd thing--I keep coming across indications of Calvinists who could have fun, though they doubtless thought that they would pay for it later, and whose political intelligence was second to none. Althusius springs to mind, for instance. But then what am I thinking, I thought to myself? I've sat on balconi...
11 comments
Read more
Dublin's New Land War There are some lessons for free market ideologues, not the least of whom is Guido Fawkes (a blogger whose posts I like a great deal), in what is happening in Ireland. You'll recall that NAMA plan . It was a plan to set up a National Asset Management Authority, a bit like McCain's 'toxic bank scheme' in 2008. The idea is that the state could buy, transfer and underwrite toxic mortgages, and move those assets to a new body. The banks would also support the new body minimally, leaving themselves free to lend and to rebuild their balance sheets without being nationalised. State payments for the new assets would move money to the banks, and put a floor under losses. Many of those who hate and despise the idea of government actually asserting control over things it pays for liked this idea. It was contrasted to Gordon Brown's 'cash for shares' deal, and to Barack Obama's 'subsidy plus levy' plans. When accompanied by a bank-f...
5 comments
Read more
Those Pesky Militia O cohors militiae. O successores. O vos imitatores. O dulcis electe. O victoriosissimi. O cruor sanguinis. O vis aeternitatis. O splendidissima gemma/Hodie aperuit. O victoriosissimi. O virga ac diadema. Caritas abundant. Ave Maria. O frondens virga. O viridissima virga; Annuntietur. Latuit. O virgo. Benedictus sis tu. Iam laetaris. Christe Patris excels If Hildegard of Bingen doesn't get you going, I don't know what will. Last year, as the summer heated the cage that western societies have become for so many, the militia movement in the United States revived , at least according to the Southern Poverty Law Centre . The Militias were last in the news in the nineties, when for many they incubated violent 'conspiracism' about the American government. I was never really that convinced. America has a perfectly legal tradition of militias; in fact, the only times when it has been genuinely called into question and limited was when socialists and psuedo-i...
2 comments
Read more