Skip to main content
The Dodd Plan to avoid Paulson's Tax-grab

Chris Dodd has just published a brilliant plan to counter the republic-threatening Paulson plan. Here is the link; what's inspired is that bad mortgages are destroyed, the poor get new reissued ones predicated on a 15% reduced house price, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation--the nationalised non private guarantor of the banks--gets the income.

The republic is fighting back.

These are tactics from people who seem to sense where we need to go if we can avert disaster in the long term. I thought that Dodd was a senate boob; I was wrong, on this evidence, and very badly so.

We should gradually untie and dissect the banks, the hedge funds, and the vast global malefactors. Then we should tie value, credit and worth to production and land, and prevent the creation of a vast and exploitative planetary aristocracy of wealth. I am coming to the conclusion that such a disinflation is in fact a kind of public moral enterprise, and that it would challenge most of the common sense wisdom of the past century. We need trade unions to coordinate globally, and we need policies that rebalance economies towards people's lives and jobs locally. We need social ownership.

History is a very rough guide; but inflated, worthless money tied to a credit carousel in an ocean of debt is a route to empire, fascism and collapse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...

What really happened to JFK and America in Dallas?

 I realised some time ago that my students do not understand references to the events of November 1963 in Dallas anymore. So I have been using a break to compile a briefing book on the events, the use of commissions and enquiries to pursue particular narratives, and the embedding of the JFK assassination in American culture. This is the first chapter. It is a very long read. All mistakes are my own.  Before the Assassination Lee Harvey Oswald was a US Marine and radar operator at the Atsugi naval base, carrying an elevated clearance. He was also learning Russian and loudly proclaiming his Marxist-Leninist sympathies. These were not investigated or treated as a security risk. [1] Whilst at Atsugi, Oswald probably became one of a number of American marines in a programme to identify moles within the security establishment. This required him to cut his Marine service short by suggesting that he had to look after a sick mother, and also that he wished to seek higher education ...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...