Skip to main content

Abiotic Oil and Global Cooling

There are two scientific debates picking up strength on the internet which the mainstream media seems scared to report. One--that over abiotic oil--has been one that I have posted about from time to time.

As a non scientist, I think that the evidence for peak oil, if oil is a fossil fuel, is robust and persuasive. I was very worried by it this time last year.

It could be that most oil on this planet is the consequence of fossil fuel, but that some is not. It could be that the petrochemical establishment in the west has been completely wrong for a hundred years about oil; they were about ether, for instance, and that didn't stop the discovery of radio. Now, we may have the beginnings of an evidence-based debate.

I hope I am wrong, and that we are not about to run out of energy because oil at viable prices is past peak flow. This site, were it to be shown to be based on proof, would suggest I am wrong.

Anaconda, who has left an interesting comment on an earlier piece of mine, appears on lots of the abiotic oil websites and his requirement is that scientists simply 'prove' how oil is a fossil fuel to him (I say him, though I do not know Anaconda's sex).

A second debate that you will not hear much about in the old-fashioned press is that around global cooling. I had a drink with a highly qualified atmospheric chemist today, who noted that temperatures around the world have not been rising since 1998. I also note that solar cycle 24 has still not started. I note the persuasive and clear arguments linking solar storms, sunspots, and cloud cover, as well as heat reaching earth, with global temperature. It may be that we are in for some global cooling, and that the political and scientific establishment has been absolutely wrong about what seems the leap-of-faith science built into carbon-based global warming.

Have a look at the links and theories. I am fascinated by this debate, since the science on either side does not seem to me to be either wild or crazy. As Anaconda has pointed out elsewhere on this blog, 'nature's truth is independent of man's desire'.

Comments

Anonymous said…
A thoughful post.
Martin Meenagh said…
Many thanks

Popular posts from this blog

William Orpen There are four major Christian traditions, which are of course Catholic, Orthodox, Armenian and Coptic. Some sects and cults also exist, like the Moonies or Anglicanism. Yet in some bizarre way this weekend, protestant contributions to something other than the seizure of churches have been making their way into my consciousness. I suppose that the first indication of this trend was a reflection in an old copy of Gibbon that he actually became cultured because of Calvinism. Packed off to Switzerland because he went Catholic at an otherwise boring Oxford, Gibbon fell in love with Suzanne Cuchod, and with Greek because of instruction from a Calvinist mentor. It's an odd thing--I keep coming across indications of Calvinists who could have fun, though they doubtless thought that they would pay for it later, and whose political intelligence was second to none. Althusius springs to mind, for instance. But then what am I thinking, I thought to myself? I've sat on balconi...
Dublin's New Land War There are some lessons for free market ideologues, not the least of whom is Guido Fawkes (a blogger whose posts I like a great deal), in what is happening in Ireland. You'll recall that NAMA plan . It was a plan to set up a National Asset Management Authority, a bit like McCain's 'toxic bank scheme' in 2008. The idea is that the state could buy, transfer and underwrite toxic mortgages, and move those assets to a new body. The banks would also support the new body minimally, leaving themselves free to lend and to rebuild their balance sheets without being nationalised. State payments for the new assets would move money to the banks, and put a floor under losses. Many of those who hate and despise the idea of government actually asserting control over things it pays for liked this idea. It was contrasted to Gordon Brown's 'cash for shares' deal, and to Barack Obama's 'subsidy plus levy' plans. When accompanied by a bank-f...
Tough Times in the Irish Republic I keep hearing wrenching human stories about just how tough things have got in Ireland. The Republic is the one country hit even worse than Britain by the latest world crash, in part because it held the poisoned causes of the troubles closer to itself even than England did. I went frequently to Dublin in that time. One look at the landscape of euro-city, and you knew you were at the Dodge county line, or maybe Vegas. Unlike Vegas, however, it was obvious that what happened in Dublin wasn't staying there. For instance, one legacy of the Irish revolution all those years ago, aided in the west by the tendency of communities to cause real trouble to people who tried to interfere, was that when owned, land seemed yours . In England, all sorts of restrictions could be applied to it; in the booming Ireland to which the children of emigrants were returning ten years ago, one could build whatever one liked, paint it whatever colour, and sell it to just abou...