Skip to main content
Sarko's Plan for the European Commission

Nicolas Sarkozy is reported by Die Welt, via EU Observer, to have associated himself with a scheme to cut European Commissioners. By the way, the above Die Welt link is in German, which for some reason they insist in writing in over there. That isn't the strangest language thing I heard today though. Over lunch with a friend, I was told that Henry VIII annotated a copy of Drzic's 'dundo maroja' in Croat and Latin. Presumably he was familiar with the tongue because of the importance of the Venetian Republic back then, but you live and learn. I find it hard to believe.

Anyway, the Commission, which is the executive arm of the EU, and which proposes, executes, and enforces European directives, regulations and decisions across the Union, is currently composed of one commissioner from every country plus a President. It acts as a college, though individual commissioners have particular portfolios. With 27 EU members, it is unwieldy, and, like other serious European institutions and even the Parliament, is finding business hard to do.

Since the Commission sometimes fancies itself as a sort of federal government for the EU, this lack of flexibility and efficiency is embarrassing to it.

One of the big issues behind the recent rejection of the Lisbon reform treaty by Ireland was a proposal within the treaty to cut the permanent presence of commissioners from specific countries, and to rotate seats in a new unbalanced commission.

This should not have been a contentious issue in theory, because all commissioners once appointed swear an oath to Europe and abjure national interests; but everybody knows that some more than others make sure that their own nations get looked after. This is inevitable and a fact of life.

M.Sarkozy's plan seems to be group commission seats 'culturally'. This means that the Atlantic Archipelago, which the French insist on calling 'Anglo-Saxon' will share a commissioner. So could Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg; so could Germany and Austria; so, presumably could Portugal and Spain.

Some overheated business commentators already refer to 'Anglo-Saxon', 'Nordic', 'continental' and Mediterranean' economic zones. Presumably, part of this effort stems from a combination of envy of America and a liberal misconception of the USA as an enlightenment republic balanced against a series of defined regional identities of which 'Southern' is the most prominent. The flaw in this comparison is that most people who are not part of the European elite would resist such regionalisation as strongly as they'd head off to the real United States permanently given half a chance.

Let's not dismiss this stupid idea out of hand altogether. It makes for summer fantasies of a mischievous sort. Why not reverse the destruction of 1918, for instance, and have an 'Austro-Hungarian' seat ("Indivisibiliter ac Inseparabiliter")?

Or let the Germans represent the Frankish lands and Poland too? And German Belgium. And North Italy. And the Ukraine. And Tunbridge Wells, Christ Church College Oxford, and the Inner Temple.

Or just have one Iberian commissioner, who could also represent Wallonia?

We could have a Yugloslav commissioner as an apology for Hans-Dietrich Genscher's destruction of that country, and Turkey could finally come in only if it readopted Greek and agreed to be ruled from Byzantium.

Then we'd all be happy in our shared cultural sodalities. It'd be as though John Calhoun and his plan for concurrent majorities had never gone off to burn in Hades.

Frankly, the one admirable state apart from Ireland (and Ireland is most admirable as a country, not as a state) in the EU at the moment, as far as I can tell is Germany. They're the only two I would be happy to see in a relationship, and that's as likely as the Pope going out with Elton John.

Is this really the best Sarko can do in August? I know that he must be occupied with his gorgeous wife and all, but really--letting in Canada or deciding to take the European Parliament seriously would make more sense. And doing either would be insane.

How about outsourcing control to the Holy See, which runs a global church, and one of the world's biggest and most efficient welfare operations across the planet for much less money? I wouldn't want the Vatican's crime rate though. I would also point out that the Vatican budget deficit is one of the lowest in Europe.

Go on Sarko. Return to your tiny desk, have another sip of rose juice and come up with something better.

The picture at the top of this blog of course shows a meeting of the London Labour group of European MEPs with the Commission.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...