Skip to main content
The South Ossetia Anschluss and an American Suez

News about Ossetia is greatly complicated at the moment. A very well funded public relations campaign is in full swing on the part of the Georgian government, which yesterday, for instance, took out full page advertisements in the Financial Times and other newspapers. Others seem to be spinning sources. For example, a statement by the South Ossetian 'parliamentary speaker' becomes a 'prediction by a senior official' whom some reports imply is a Russian official.

The summary of what seems to be being mooted this morning, however, is that South Ossetia will be joined at some point to north ossetia and that it will become 'Alania'. The Alans, of course, were last heard of this side of Europe when they menaced the Romans at the fall of the West. 'Alania' will then be absorbed as some sort of oblast or Krais or autonomous republic in Russia.

Ripples from the Russian action keep spreading; just have a look at the Interfax news agency to see that.

The Nabucco gas pipeline--Europe's non Russia alternative--is in intensive care. It was very troubled to start with. If it were not for the Chinese, whose main principle seems to be restraint and balance in international affairs (at the minute), Russia would have overawed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation the other day. This would have secured the gas and oil of central Asia. Russia has not, therefore, achieved total success; but it has something near that.

I wrote at the time that what has just gone on was an oil and gas anschluss with territory attached. This morning, that seems to be happening. The West and its front states seem to have responded by purporting to be able to tell the Russian Navy what to do in the Black Sea.

They have some legal basis, since the existence of a Russian port in the Ukraine is a matter of treaty. this has been true since Khruschev got a bit drunk or enthusiastic and redrew borders on the Black sea. He knew a lot about the Ukraine, having murdered many there for Stalin, and I suppose it was his way of pretending the USSR was a collection of free states who could resolve their differences peacefully. It was in fact of course some sort of combination of Upper Voltan prison, charnel house and asylum with rockets.

This blog, amongst others, has been going on about the UN convention on the law of the sea for a long time. Russia has been relatively 'very quiet' about this demand to limit its naval deployment. Why? The last time it went quieter than anyone expected was Kosovo.

If the road to Ossetia was traced through Kosovo, why will a Black Sea confrontation not lead to an Iranian order to American ships in the Straits of Hormuz? A credible scenario, given America's fiscal weakness and overstretch at the moment, is emerging that could give rise to an American 'Suez'.

We are not on it, but there is a cliff edge approaching.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...