Skip to main content
Georgia's options

For a long time, many Georgians, including a friend of mine who is now dead, have suggested at every opportunity that Georgia is being run by some globalised international group of lawyers and financiers. I always argued with them, because I thought that I saw in their distaste a sort of barely disguised anti-semitism, or at least the use of an old conspiracy theory for their own purposes.

Now, others are arguing that the Georgian government is a puppet of the USA, that it pushed Russia too far over Ossetia out of contempt, and that it thought that it would be backed by the west if it moved to try and crush its South Ossetia problem. In essence, this argument creates the basis for blaming the Georgian government for what is now happening in that country as a consequence of the Russian invasion.

There is a way for Georgian leaders to show that they are really concerned for their country and that they are not acting at the behest of some international group.

Firstly, shut down the oil pipeline that runs from Sangachal to Supsa and Ceyan, even if it has just restarted.
Secondly, refer again and again to Article V of the NATO treaty and demand support, even if Georgia is not yet in NATO .
Thirdly, issue a draft, and promise a status referendum in South Ossetia as soon as foreign troops leave its soil. This could be accompanied with an invitation to UN observers to base themselves there.

These are, after all, the steps that innocent countries taken by surprise would take.
Do you think that they will be allowed to do any of these things? Have those who planned their operation in South Ossetia against Russians thought them through?

I do not think that any of this has been properly prepared for. I think that Georgia is not a wronged party, and that they have been encouraged in this by elements within the American administration. I think that they will abandon this fight if the Russians keep punching as hard as they are punching because fundamentally the government of that country is only interested in the personal survival of its members.

But I stand ready to be proved wrong. My opinion is, as usual, irrelevant. This weekend, thousands of people have died as a consequence of the folly of war. May God have mercy on them.

Comments

xxancroft said…
Check this link to see the Israeli connection to Georgia.
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1358

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...