Skip to main content
"The Israelis" and Georgia

I should declare my hand here. I am a supporter of the state of Israel, I find it amazing that its right to exist is questioned and, in what is I hope the highest sense of the term, I am a zionist and always was.

It's necessary to say that because the meme developing about the Ossetia war clearly is 'oh the Israelis were there' and various people on the left and the pro-war right have decided that this is the key to any argument on the issue. It isn't, but because I linked to debka.com's first reports, I wanted to include the following update.

There is not proof that the Israelis as a group of military advisers were in Georgia at the weekend, though the numbers suggested are so great that any involvement will ultimately be hard to hide. The Israeli Foreign Ministry itself has openly acknowledged the vast scale of Israeli arms supplies to Georgia. Israel's interest in Georgia's oil pipeline, which is a commercial and a strategic one and of course also part of private business, not state activity, has been long acknowledged.

Various messageboards, of which this one is a good example, are now pointing out that Debka com carried two stories within twenty four hours. One suggested that Israelis were aiding and abetting Georgia; another suggested, slightly more believably, that the Israelis realised how mad an ethnic cleansing and provocation of Russia was and tried to restrain the Georgians. It may be that the real, inevitably garbled story, is located somewhere between these poles, assuming that the Israelis were there and were anything more than observers, which is not yet acknowledged.

Haaretz, which is not always reliable in these matters, has reported that Israel is very keen to keep a low profile in the Ossetia matter, presumably because everyone and anyone with an agenda in Christendom and whatever the secularists call themselves is now going to weigh in. That is certainly supported by this minimal statement from the Israeli Foreign Ministry.

I have a feeling that Georgia's government is going to be left to hang in the wind for what it clearly is accountable for and that everyone else (including this 'unnamed US official') is backing away behind pictures of an humanitarian disaster, really quite fast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...