Skip to main content
David Milliband


This blog, along with some others, may have given in the past the impression of agreement with the great Robert Graham Marshall Andrews, of Gray's Inn and Westminster, that her Britannic Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs was some sort of 'pillock on a gap year'.

For the benefit of American readers, a 'pillock' is a derogatory term for a twit, derived from the 'pole-lock' or 'dildo' which hangs down from horsehair wigs of the sort nowadays rarely seen outside of Her Majesty's higher courts.

Far be it from me to contradict Sir Robert the Lord Marshall-Andrews, who once lived in an underground house, but I think Mr Milliband's performance in the late Caucasian crisis has distinguished him further. Indeed, it is foreign policy leadership of a sort only seen before in Lord Palmerston after the 19th of October,1865.

Here is a link to what he said at the weekend.
Here is another link to how Mr Milliband kept the nation informed.
Here, in fact is a link to everything Mr Milliband has done.

In memoriam of this performance,--and I mean that-- here is a video of a glove puppet late of this blog who is convinced that he is a superhero. In this adventure, he takes on a very large angry man, only to run away to stop lorries endangering children's lungs, and farm gates, or something. Then, when he awakes, no one will believe his tales, so he throws himself down the stairs.

I'm thinking seriously of using a 'Sooty' picture every time I mention Dmitry Medvedev in the future, but I am considering a trip to Russia this year or early next and don't want the vision of it to fall upon differently focused eyeballs down a Moscow sewer. So I won't.



UPDATE: Yes, I am also aware that I was snitty about John McCain calling 'whoever Putin gets to be Russian President a "stooge" ' the other day. It's an obvious contradiction, but I couldn't resist. As an aside, blog 'policy' is that if I have write something wrong or silly, and you can point it out, I'll be happy to acknowledge it so long as your posts are not anonymous, or personally abusive, but I'll leave the original post up unchanged unless the error is one of fact. Corrections will come in response to comments or in a separate post. Anonymous, criminal or abusive comments will normally not be put up, but practically anything else that passes muster will.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I resign from the Labour Party The likes of Andy Burnham, Hazel Blears, Mary Honeyball and Luke Akehurst are now representative of the Labour Party. They have at least given me a clear mind in recent days, and for that, I suppose, I should be grateful. I have been a Labour member since I was 16, in a steeltown. I can just about accept that student union hacks with no proper job experience can spend their time undercutting unions and selling public administration to their mates, because something could arise that may be better. I can also accept that some immigrants, because of a misplaced desire to avoid the appearance of racism, are more 'acceptable' to the Left than others, so my own family's Irish Catholicism can be something to be sneered at by the ranks of Labour activists. I can accept that there may be a fiscal case for not taxing the super rich with capital gains, but not for truckling to them or sucking up to the likes of Rupert Murdoch. I can accept that there mig...
A Jacksonian Republican Party Democrats in the United States frequently lay claim to the heritage of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. They present the two as tribunes of the revolutionary people, and Jefferson-Jackson dinners are often occasions at which aspiring candidates can strut their demotic stuff, as it were. Both Presidents were opposed to coalitions made up of those they saw as 'elitists' and federal empire-builders, in the Federalist or Whig Parties. J-J (to employ a short and composite form, a bit like the creators of San Trovaso in Venice) were nationalists, tough on foreign crime, sure of their often violent support, and ferocious in the support of presidents who protected the republic. They upheld gun rights and, those of the traditional holders of property, emphasised the rights of States, and an armed citzenry, and in general thought all opposed to them belonged to some conspiracy, probably associated with Europe, to take away their Scots-Irish and democrat...
In Defence of The Pope In recent days, wild allegations, and frankly mad chains of causation, have been constructed around Pope Benedict. I don't think that I have anything to prove on my attitude to the disgusting things that were done by men breaking their vows, who were often protected by Bishops who were also in a deranged relationship with their duty. However, I do intensely dislike the stupidity of some of the assault. England seems particularly gripped by antipapist feeling. This has been true in its past, when the country is under pressure, and has been a strand in its identity since 1533. It emerges at times of great pressure, like the 1850s or 1730s, often when the English people realise that someone is undermining and impoverishing them and fail to see that the culprits are their own elites. However, it now seems clear that Josef Ratzinger, when a cardinal, was involved in a process that extended the time in which victims of sexual violence could bring clai ms beyond tha...